Manoj Kumar Yadav v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7234/2022 MANOJ KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Saahila Lamba and Ms.

Nidh Sharma, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb,CGSC, Adv Tushar Sannu and Adv Parvin Bansal Mr Athurv Insp CRPF, Mr Inderpal And Mr Ramniwas Yadav CRPF

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER(ORAL) % 18.11.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1.

The petitioner seeks re-fixation of seniority without impleading necessary parties.

2.

Accordingly, it is well-settled in State of Rajasthan v Ucchab Lal Chhanwal1, Vijay Kumar Kaul v Union of India2, Indu Shekhar Singh v State of U.P.3, J.S. Yadav v State of U.P4 and Padam Singh Jhina v Union of India5, that in cases of seniority unless necessary parties are impleaded, the petition is not maintainable. 1 (2014) 1 SCC 144 2 (2012) 7 SCC 610 3 (2006) 8 SCC 129 4 (2011) 6 SCC 570 5 (1974) 1 SLR 594 (SC) W.P.(C) 7234/2022 Signed By:GUNN 11:48:20

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to re-institute the petition after impleading necessary parties. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025/AT W.P.(C) 7234/2022 Signed By:GUNN 11:48:20