Iia Patnaik v. Arunava Ghosh Dastidar & ORS

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 71/2019, CM APPL. 16782/2019 (Stay) and CM APPL. 16785/2019 (Delay 34 of days in filing appeal) ILA PATNAIK .....Appellant Through:

Mr.Prag P.Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Hemant Phalpher, Mr.Parth Goswami and Mr.Srinivasan Ramaswamy, Advocates.

Versus

ARUNAVA GHOSH DASTIDAR & ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr.Jayant Mehta, Ms.Drishti Harpalani and Mr.Debopriyo Moulik, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Mr.Piyush Singh and Mr.Akshay Srivastava, Advocates for Respondent No. 3.

Mr.Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Advocate for Respondents No. 4 to 7.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 01.10.2019

1. Learned senior counsel appearing for the Appellant on instructions states that the Appellant do not wish to press this appeal and will reserve their liberty to urge the points raised here in their applications pending before the learned Single Judge.

2. The above statement is taken on record. The appeal and the FAO(OS)71/2019 Page 1 of 2

pending applications are dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

OCTOBER 1, 2019 v FAO(OS)71/2019 Page 2 of 2