Raju & ORS. v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3420/2023 & CRL.M.As. 12863-12864/2023 RAJU & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Sumit Rana, Advocate with petitioners in person.

versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Sartaj Khan PS Karawal Nagar, Delhi.

Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 21.02.2024 1.

The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 447/2016 registered under Sections 452/308/34 IPC at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners trespassed and injured respondent No.2 and two other persons. 3.

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, learned APP for the State, submits that the petitioners are the only accused persons and apart from respondent No. 2, who is the complainant/victim, there are two other injured/victims namely Vijay Singh and Rinku whose MLC were prepared. He further submits that in the present case charge sheet has already been filed. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the parties have amicably settled their disputes out of court. It is further stated that the other The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

injured namely Vijay Singh and Rinku have also given their no-objection affidavits. Copy of the same have been handed over in Court and the same are taken on record. In view of the same, respondent No.2 as well as the other injured are left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners. 5.

Petitioners, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as the I.O. Respondent No.2 and the other two complainants namely Vijay Singh and Rinku, who are present in the Court, have been identified by I.O.

6.

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and they undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No. 2 as well as the other injured persons state that they have compromised the matter out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further states that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of consolidated cost of Rs.5,000/- by the petitioners with Delhi State Legal Services Authority within a period of two weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

10.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the Investigating Officer as well as in Court.

11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of along with pending applications.

12.

In case proof of cost is not deposited within two weeks, the matter be placed before the Court.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 21, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.