Jane Alam Ansari v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

$~12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1050/2019 JANE ALAM ANSARI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Orangzeb Ali Khan, Advocate (M) 9990499261 and Mr.

Rahul Kumar, Advocate along with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) along with Mr.

Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for State.

Inspector Anwar Khan, ASI Hari Singh, P.S. Jaitpur.

Ms. Nisha Bharti along with her father, Mr.

Ashutosh Kumar @ Abhishek Bharti, respondent No. 6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% 10.05.2019 Ms. Nisha Bharti has been produced before this Court. In view of the circumstance that, Ms. Nisha Bharti has expressed her will to reside at her parental house in District Nalanda, Bihar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions from the latter, does not press this habeas corpus petition, any further. Leave granted.

The habeas corpus petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(CRL) 1050/2019

The petitioner, Mr. Jane Alam Ansari is, however, directed to return the original documents of Ms. Nisha Bharti to the Investigating Officer Mr. Anwar Khan, Police Station Jaitpur, forthwith. Upon receipt of the said original documents, the IO shall transmit the same to Ms. Nisha Bharti, at her address in District Nalanda, Bihar. With the above directions, the habeas corpus petition is disposed of. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J ANU MALHOTRA, J MAY 10, 2019 RS W.P.(CRL) 1050/2019