← Library
High Court of DelhiO.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/40/2018

Gtl Infrastructure Limited v. Aircel Limited & ORS.

2018-04-06Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru2 pages

$~33 to 36 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 40/2018 & IA No. 1895/2018 GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms Shyel Trehan, Mr Varun Kumar, Ms Akshita Sachdeva Ms Avshreya Rudy and Ms Nandini Singh, Advocates.

versus AIRCEL LIMITED & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Vaibhav Niti and Mr Rishi Agrawala, Advocates.

Mr Raunak Dhillon, Mr George Varghese and Mr Karan Khanna, Advocates for SBI.

WITH + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 41/2018 & IA No. 1879/2018 GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms Shyel Trehan, Mr Varun Kumar, Ms Akshita Sachdeva Ms Avshreya Rudy and Ms Nandini Singh, Advocates.

versus AIRCEL LIMITED & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Vaibhav Niti and Mr Rishi Agrawala, Advocates.

Mr Raunak Dhillon, Mr George Varghese and Mr Karan Khanna, Advocates for SBI.

WITH + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 68/2018 ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.

LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Ms Aishwarya Modi, Advocate.

versus

AIRCEL LIMITED, & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Vaibhav Niti and Mr Rishi Agrawala, Advocates.

AND + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 126/2018 & IA No. 3851/2018 ERICSSON INDIA PVT. LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Anil K. Kher, Sr. Advocate with Ms Namita Sharma and Ms Subiya Akbar Warsi, Advocates.

versus AIRCEL LIMITED & ORS.

..... Respondents Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 06.04.2018 1.

The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the orders have been passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The parties state that in terms of Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereafter 'IB Code'), there is a moratorium on continuation of the present proceedings, as the application filed by the respondent (the corporate debtor) under Section 10 of the IB Code to initiate insolvency resolution process has been admitted by NCLT.

2.

In this view, these petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive all the petitions, as and when permissible. VIBHU BAKHRU, J APRIL 06, 2018 MK