← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2799/2024

Muzahid Hussain @ Chand And ANR v. State Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR

2024-04-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri3 pages

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2799/2024 MUZAHID HUSSAIN @ CHAND AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Rahul Mohod and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sankar, Advocates with petitioners in person.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Ramvir Singh PS Burari, Delhi.

Mr. Gaurav Pradhan, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 08.04.2024 1.

The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 307/2016 registered under Section 324/34 IPC at Police Station Burari, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners gave beatings to the complainant on account of some money dispute as a result of which the complainant sustained injuries.

3.

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim in the present case. It is further submitted that the chargesheet has been filed and charges have been framed under the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

said sections only.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes vide Compromise Deed dated 23.01.2024, a copy of which has been placed on record. In terms of the said settlement, complainant is now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners. 5.

The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as the I.O./ SI Ramvir Singh PS Burari, Delhi who is present in the Court.

6.

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No. 2 also states that he has entered into the aforementioned compromise out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. He further states that he has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.25,000/- out of which Rs.15,000/- to be paid to the respondent No.2 by way of demand draft through IO and Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority(Account No.18580110053263, UCO Bank, Branch Rouse Avenue, IFSC: UCBA0003364) within a period of two weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. as well as in Court.

10.

A copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority for intimation. 11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.

12.

In case receipt of cost is not filed within two weeks, the matter be placed before the Court.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J APRIL 8, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.