Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Collagen Lifesciences Private Limited

$~28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 301/2025 & I.A. 8775-8779/2025 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Urfee Roomi, Ms. Janaki Arun, Mr. Ayush Dixit, Mr. Arpit Singhal, Mr. Ritesh Kumar and Ms. Vanshika Banshal, Advocates versus COLLAGEN LIFESCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through:

Mr. Amit Tomar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 04.04.2025 I.A. 8777/2025 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to the plaintiff filing clear/translated/original documents within four weeks.

2.

Application disposed of.

I.A. 8776/2025 (O-XI R-1(4) of the Commercial Courts Act), I.A. 8778/2025 (u/s 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015) & I.A. 8779/2025 (seeking permission to file documents in sealed cover) 3.

Counsel for the plaintiff does not press these applications at this stage. 4.

Accordingly, the same are dismissed as not pressed. CS(COMM) 301/2025 5.

Issue summons in the suit.

CS(COMM) 301/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2025 at 11:59:51

6.

Mr. Amit Tomar, counsel appearing for the defendant who appears on advance service accepts summons and submits that he will be filing his Vakalatnama during the course of day.

7.

At the outset, counsel for the defendant submits on instructions that he has no objection if a decree of permanent injunction is passed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) of the plaint. 8.

Counsel for the plaintiff is agreeable to the aforesaid. 9.

Accordingly, a decree of permanent injunction in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) of the plaint is passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

10.

Counsel for the plaintiff does not wish to press for the remaining reliefs prayed for in the plaint.

11.

Decree sheet be drawn up.

12.

All pending applications stand disposed of.

13.

Since the suit has been settled on the first date itself, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the counsel of the plaintiff, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

AMIT BANSAL, J APRIL 4, 2025 ds CS(COMM) 301/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2025 at 11:59:51