Sunil Bhasin & ANR. v. Nayyarah Qaiser

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 130/2023 & CM APPL. 5444/2024 SUNIL BHASIN & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

None versus NAYYARAH QAISER .....Respondent Through:

Mr. I. Ahmed and Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN

O R D E R

% 17.09.2024 1.

Present none on behalf of the petitioners when the case is called out for hearing for the second time at about 2:40 PM. 2.

Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate for the respondent stated that the possession of the tenanted premises has already been restored back to the respondent/landlord and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.

3.

In view of the law and observations laid down in judgment dated 26.07.2024 passed in RC.REV. 284/2023 titled as Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons V Shri Ajay Khurana, the present petition has become infructuous as the possession of the tenanted premises has already been taken over by the respondent/landlord in execution of warrant of possession in accordance with law.

4.

Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:25

stands dismissed being infructuous.

DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 N/TK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:25