Dr Rajinder Kumar Trisal v. Dr Reshmi Singh & ANR.
$~18 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 590/2024
(18) DR RAJINDER KUMAR TRISAL .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr.
Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.
+ CONT.CAS(C) 591/2024
(19) DR RAVI RAMAN DHAR .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr.
Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.
+ CONT.CAS(C) 592/2024
(20) DR CHAMAN LAL DULLOO .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr.
Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.
+ CONT.CAS(C) 593/2024
(21) DR BHARAT BHUSHAN KACHROO .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr.
Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.
+ CONT.CAS(C) 594/2024
(22) DR UPENDER KRISHEN WALI .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr.
Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.
+ CONT.CAS(C) 595/2024
(23) DR VIJAY KUMAR KACHROO .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr.
Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 17.02.2026
O R D E R
1.
None appears for the petitioners.
2.
The present petitions allege wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the judgment dated 08.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7917/2019. The operative direction contained therein reads as under:- "16. In view of the aforesaid findings, the impugned orders granting second and third time-bound promotions to the Petitioner from 16.03.2017 instead of 01.04.1995 and 01.04.2000 respectively, are required to be modified to a limited extent by deleting the words 'notional' and 'monetary' and holding that the Petitioner shall be entitled to all monetary effects ensuing from the two time-bound promotions from the respective dates from which the promotions have been actually granted.
It is further directed that Respondents shall refix the salary and emoluments of the Petitioner, if required, and calculate the arrears due from the dates of second and third time bound promotions and disburse the arrears within three months from today. Failure to release the arrears within the time granted by the Court will entail granting simple interest @ 9% p.a. from the dates the amount fell due till actual payment. These directions are being passed in respect of all Petitioners in the aforementioned six petitions." 3.
It transpires during the course of hearing that an LPA came to be The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
filed against the aforesaid judgment being LPA Nos. 872/2024, 876/2024, 877/2024, 879/2024, 882/2024, 883/2024, which has been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 10.10.2025. The operative portion thereof reads as under:- 4.
In the circumstances, it is incumbent on the respondents to act in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 08.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7917/2019 and comply with the directions contained therein. Let the same be done expeditiously 5.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that an exercise is ongoing to ascertain the financial impact of the judgment. He assures and undertakes that requisite steps shall be taken expeditiously to adhere/ comply with the orders passed by this Court. He submits that the Department is also in the process of taking legal opinion to consider whether The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
it would be advisable to file an SLP in the Supreme Court. 6.
In the circumstances, it is directed that unless compliance is obviated on account of any interim orders passed by the Supreme Court, the respondents shall comply with the concerned directions therein within a period of eight weeks from today.
7.
The petitions are disposed of in the above terms. 8.
In the event of non-compliance, the petitioners shall be at liberty to revive the present proceedings.
SACHIN DATTA, J FEBRUARY 17, 2026/uk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.