Mukesh v. State

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 289/2017 MUKESH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate along with petitioner's mother.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with W/SI Suman, PS Kalyanpuri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 24.04.2017 1.

The instant writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months to file SLP. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.

Nominal Roll dated 07.12.2016 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376(g) IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 5,000/-. Crl.A.1514/2011 was dismissed by this Court on 10.08.2016. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone five years, eleven months and four days incarceration besides remission for two months and one day as on 07.12.2016. He has not availed any parole / interim bail. W.P.(CRL) 289/2017

3.

Address of the petitioner has been verified. Petitioner's mother is present in the Court. She states that she will stand surety for the petitioner if he is granted parole.

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `40,000/- with surety of his mother in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

5.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J.

APRIL 24, 2017 / tr W.P.(CRL) 289/2017