Kailash Chand Goyal v. Tata Power Distribution Limited & ANR.

via Video-conferencing $~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 993/2020 and Crl.M.A. Nos.8433/2020 (stay) & 8434/2020 (exemption) SH. KAILASH CHAND GOYAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mohammad Kaushar Perwez, Advocate.

Versus

TATA POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITED & ANR..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Manish Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Rijul Taneja, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for respondent No.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 30.06.2020 The petitioner, who is a consumer of electricity, seeks quashing of notice dated 19.06.2020 issued by respondent No.1/Tata Power Distribution Limited seeking to disconnect the petitioner's electricity connection by reason of alleged non-payment of dues. As per the averments in the petition, the notice was served upon the petitioner on 23.06.2020.

2.

Mr. Manish Srivastava, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No.1/Tata Power Distribution Limited on advance copy.

W.P.(Crl.) 993/2020 Page of

3.

Ms. Kamna Vohra, learned Additional Standing Counsel has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no.2/SHO, PS : Keshav Puram.

4.

After making some submissions, Mr. Mohammad Kaushar Perwez, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, as may be permissible, in accordance with law.

5.

Accordingly the present writ petition and all pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

JUNE 30, 2020 Ne W.P.(Crl.) 993/2020 Page of