Ram Avtar v. State

$~7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 972/2019 RAM AVTAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Pawan Kumar, Bahl, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 08.08.2019 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case directions are issued for expeditious disposal and recording of the prosecution evidence, he has instructions not to press this petition at this stage. 2.

Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances and also the fact that petitioner has been in custody now for over five years and has not been given the benefit of regular bail, Trial Court is directed to expedite the recording of the prosecution evidence and endeavour to conclude the same within six months from the next date before the Trial Court. 3.

In view of the above directions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.

The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid directions.

5.

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 08, 2019/rk