Virendra Sharma v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi)

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 213/2018 VIRENDRA SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. L.K. Mishra, Adv.

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP with W/SI Sonia, P.S. Ghazipur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 04.10.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is father-inlaw of the prosecutrix. On account of matrimonial dispute between the petitioner's son and prosecutrix, petitioner has been falsely implicated. There is a delay of about two years in registration of FIR. Prosecutrix has alleged in the FIR that petitioner had given her a Laddu laced with some intoxicating substance on 28th November, 2016. Thereafter petitioner raped her.

Petitioner also made an obscene video clip by his mobile phone. Thereafter, he continued to physically exploit her by threatening her that in case she resisted he would put the video clip on the social media. It is contended that FIR has been lodged on 13th July, 2018. Investigations are over.

Petitioner has participated in the investigations. Charge-sheet has already been filed, inasmuch as, charges

have been framed and trial is underway.

Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, it is ordered that in case of arrest petitioner be released on bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO of the concerned police station.

Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

OCTOBER 04, 2018 ga