Ravissant Private Limited v. Anil Kumar Jain Silver & ANR.

$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 318/2025 & I.As. 9099/2025, 9100/2025, 9104/2025 RAVISSANT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand and Ms. Nimrat Singh, Advocates.

versus ANIL KUMAR JAIN SILVER & ANR.

.....Defendants Through:

Mr. Sandeep Chilana and Ms. Ipsita Kataky, Advocates for D-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 27.02.2026 1.

This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from applying or causing to be applied to any article/products, Plaintiff's registered designs bearing Nos. 267811, 287465, 297913, 297914 and 297915 and/or any fraudulent or obvious imitation thereof so as to amount to infringement of Plaintiff's registered designs, amongst other reliefs.

2.

During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre vide order dated 07.08.2025, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and a Settlement Agreement has been executed and signed on 02.02.2026, incorporating the terms of settlement. Copy of the Settlement Agreement has been placed on record.

CS(COMM) 318/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 12:58:54

3.

Mr. Pravin Anand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff, on instructions, submits that since Defendant No. 2 has expired during the pendency of the suit, no relief is claimed against the said Defendant and suit be decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against Defendant No.1 in terms of the Settlement Agreement and paragraph 59(a) to (e) of the plaint. Learned counsel acknowledges that out of a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- payable to the Plaintiff by Defendant No. 1 as per the terms of settlement, a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- has been paid by Defendant No. 1.

4.

Learned counsel for Defendant No.1 submits that the balance sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- will be paid to the Plaintiff, on or before 02.03.2026. 5.

Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against Defendant No.1 in terms of the Settlement Agreement read with paragraph 59(a) to (e) of the plaint. Defendant No.1 shall pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- to the Plaintiff positively on or before 02.03.2026. 6.

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 7.

Suit is disposed of along with pending applications. 8.

Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870.

JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026 S.Sharma CS(COMM) 318/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 12:58:54