Ambedkar Gupta v. Dr. Narinder Dhruv Batra

$~Special Bench-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT. CAS (C) 328/2020 AMBEDKAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ankur Chawla, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Advocate.

versus DR. NARENDER DHRUV BATRA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shyel Trehan and Ms. Bhagya K. Yadav, Advocate for Dr. Narinder Batra.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 03.07.2020 HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING.

CM APPLs.14068-69/2020 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CONT. CAS (C) 328/2020 1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating inter alia that the respondent is liable to be hauled up for contempt on account of wilful disobedience of the order dated 7.2.2020 passed in W.P.(C) 195/2010. 2.

We have expressed our reservation with regard to entertaining the present petition by a third party in the writ petition. 3.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of his CONT. CAS (C) 328/2020 Page 1 of 2

client to approach Mr. Rahul Mehra, the petitioner in W.P. (C) No.195/2010 and point out the material facts which are sufficient to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent, for violation of the order dated 7.2.2020.

4.

Leave as prayed for is granted. The petitioner shall examine the pleas taken in this petition and take appropriate steps. The contempt petition is disposed of.

HIMA KOHLI, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J JULY 03, 2020 NA/rkb CONT. CAS (C) 328/2020 Page 2 of 2