Rohina v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1697/2026 ROHINA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Chetan, Advocate (through videoconferencing).

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with SI Arvind, PS Gokalpuri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 04.05.2026 1.

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2021 of Police Station Gokulpuri for offence under Section 302/201/34 IPC. 2.

Broadly speaking, allegation of the prosecution is that the accused/applicant and her husband killed the deceased by squeezing his private parts because he tried to rape the accused/applicant. But the postmortem report does not show any injury on private parts of the deceased. According to post-mortem report, death of the deceased was due to strangulation. According to prosecution, since only the deceased and the accused/applicant and her husband were alone inside the tenanted premises, it is the accused/applicant and her husband, who have to disclose the manner in which the deceased was killed.

3.

At the outset, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file afresh, disclosing about The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 11:50:41

the previous bail applications.

4.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 4, 2026/dr The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 11:50:41