Rupender Dahiya v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~29 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 215/2018 RUPENDER DAHIYA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. J.P. Singh, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with ASI Vinod Kumar, P.S. Bhalswa Dairy.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 29.01.2018 Crl. M.A. 1598/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

Bail Appln. 215/2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not the owner of the offending vehicle from which illicit liquor was recovered after the driver abandoning the same on seeing the police party. In ground C of the petition, petitioner has specifically stated that he is not the owner of the offending vehicle. Application is supported by the affidavit of the petitioner. Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances, it is ordered that in case of arrest, petitioner be released on anticipatory bail

subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO of the concerned police station. Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JANUARY 29, 2018 ga