Mamta Kumari v. The State

$~Writ-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) No. 1027/2020 MAMTA KUMARI & ANR.

....Petitioners Through :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Advocate along with petitioners-in-person.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

....Respondents Through :

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) along with SI Amar Singh, Police Station R.K. Puram and Respondent no. 3-in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 15.07.2020 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] 1.

Pursuant to the order dated 07.07.2020, respondent no. 3/Mr. Shri Ram i.e. the father of petitioner no. 1 has joined the proceedings. He is accompanied by Sub-Inspector Amar Singh, Police Station R.K. Puram. 1.1 Mr. Shri Ram says that he is a government employee and is presently working in the Ministry of Defence as a Messenger. He says that his office is located in Delhi Cantt.

1.2 Mr. Shri Ram undertakes not to cause any injury or harm to the petitioners. 1.3 Mr. Shri Ram further states that he will not interfere in the marital life of the petitioners.

2.

The statement of Mr. Shri Ram is taken on record. W.P. (CRL.) No. 1027/2020 1/2 KUMAR RAI 10:09

3.

Mr. Pandey, who appears for the petitioners says that, for the moment, he is satisfied with the statement made by Mr. Shri Ram and, therefore, the captioned writ petition may be closed.

4.

It is ordered accordingly.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

JULY 15, 2020 VKR/KK Click here to check corrigendum, if any W.P. (CRL.) No. 1027/2020 2/2 KUMAR RAI 10:09