← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4428/2025

Vipin Kumar v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And ORS

2025-04-07Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mini Pushkarna2 pages

$~69 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4428/2025 & CM APPL. 20338/2025 & CM APPL. 20339/2025 VIPIN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Pulkit Gulati, Adv.(VC) Mobile No. 9891360118 Email-vasu60118@gmail.com versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Swati Jain, Adv. for MCD (VC) Mr.Kushagra Kumar, SPC for Delhi Police Mobile- 9910770710 Email-awoffice.parveen@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 07.04.2025 CM APPL. 20339/2025 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4428/2025 3.

The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent no. 1 to take action against the unauthorized construction at property no. WZ-1255 A, Nangal Raya, New Delhi-110046.

4.

Issue notice.

5.

Notice is accepted by the learned counsels appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 3.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:55:52

6.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1/ Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), submits that the authorized construction in the property, has already been booked vide order dated 07th March, 2025. She submits that the requisite action shall be taken against the unauthorized construction, after grant of hearing to the respondent no. 4, i.e., the owner/occupant of the property in question.

7.

Considering the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of, with the direction to the respondent/MCD to deal with the matter, expeditiously. In case of unauthorized construction existing in the property, requisite action for demolition/sealing of the property, shall be taken by the MCD, in accordance with the law.

8.

In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by any non-action on behalf of the respondent/MCD, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the Special Task Force, ("STF"), as constituted by the Supreme Court. 9.

Likewise, the rights and contentions of respondent no. 4, i.e., owner/occupier to challenge any action of the MCD is kept open, who has the right to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 10.

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition along with pending applications, stands disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J APRIL 7, 2025 Pallavi The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:55:52