← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/5195/2024

M/S Sania Haj Services v. Union Of India

2024-04-09Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad3 pages

$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + M/S SANIA HAJ SERVICES ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Deepak Khokhar, Ms.

Annweshaa Laskar, Ms.

Prachi Sharma & Mr. Chaitanya G. Tripathi, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Kaushal Jeet Kait, GP for UoI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 09.04.2024 1.

The Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the Communication dated 11.03.2024 issued by the Respondent rejecting the application of the Petitioner for grant of quota for Haj Group Organizer for the year 2023-24. The reasons for rejecting the application of the Petitioner has been given in paragraph No.2 of the Impugned Communication which reads as under:

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

2.

Paragraph No.3 of the Impugned Communication permits the Petitioner to submit a representation to the Apex Committee before 20.03.2024.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the reasons given for rejecting the application of the Petitioner are trivial in nature. He states that the Petitioner, within the time stipulated, has submitted its representation to the Apex Committee on 20.03.2024 which has yet not been considered.

4.

Considering the fact that the last date for granting visa expires on 29.04.2024, this Court is inclined to direct the Respondent to consider the representation dated 20.03.2024 given by the Petitioner on or before 24.04.2024.

5.

Though it is stated by the learned Counsel for the Respondent that the representation given by the Petitioner on 20.03.2024 has been rejected, the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

same has yet not been communicated to the Petitioner. If that is the case, then the Respondent is directed to communicate the decision to the Petitioner within three days to enable the Petitioner to avail of its remedies within time.

6.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case.

7.

Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in case need so arises in future.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J APRIL 9, 2024 S. Zakir The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.