Ajay Kumar v. State Of Maharashtra Through Sho Ps Mumbra, Thane And Sho Cyber Ps, Thane City & ANR.

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1399/2025, CRL.M.A. 10894/2025 (exemption) & CRL.M.(BAIL) 797/2025 (interim transit anticipatory bail) AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Jai Gaur, Advocate. And Mr.

Vijay Pandey, Adv.

versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SHO PS MUMBRA, THANE AND SHO CYBER PS, THANE CITY & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

O R D E R

% 08.04.2025 After part submissions, Mr. Jai Gaur, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/accused seeks permission to withdraw the bail application stating that he would approach the competent court at Mumbai for seeking anticipatory bail.

The statement made by learned counsel is taken on record and the bail application, along with pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J APRIL 8, 2025/ib/ak The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:39:00