Kamrul Hasan And ORS & ORS. v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3459/2026 KAMRUL HASAN AND ORS & ORS.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Moin Alam, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State.
Mohd. Suhail, Advocate for the victim.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 05.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 14032/2026 (exemption) 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 3459/2026 3.
By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 36/2021, registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') thereafter chargesheet was filed under Sections 498A/406/323/506/34 of and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (hereafter 'DP Act') and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
4.
All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned from Police Station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi. 5.
Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 31.10.2013 in accordance with Muslim rites and ceremonies. It is stated that no child was born out of the said wedlock, who is presently in the custody of respondent no. 2. It is stated that due to temperamental differences which had arisen between the petitioners and the respondent no. 2, they started living separately since April, 2019. Further, upon a complaint filed by respondent no. 2, the present FIR was registered against the petitioners. However, it is stated that during pendency of the trial, the parties have now amicably settled vide Settlement Agreement dated 18.10.2025 and an amount of ₹1,50,000/-, by way of Demand Draft, has been handed over to respondent no. 2 in Court today. 6.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 alongwith respondent no. 2, states that she has no objection, if the FIR is quashed, since she has received the entire amount which was due towards the settlement arrived at between the parties. 7.
In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any pressure, coercion, and threat, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.
8.
Accordingly, FIR bearing no. 36/2021, registered at Police Station The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Jyoti Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406 of IPC and the chargesheet filed under Sections 498A/406/323/506/34 of and Sections 3/4 DP Act and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
9.
In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. 10.
The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 05, 2026/zp/gj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.