High Court of DelhiCS(COMM)/325/2023

Aaa Infosystem Private Limited Through Its Authorized Representative Mr Madhusudan Nair v. Rma Estates And Industries Private Limited

2026-02-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad14 pages

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 325/2023 & I.A. 16448/2023, I.A. 15676/2025 AAA INFOSYSTEM PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR MADHUSUDAN NAIR .....Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Aditya Vikram Bajpai, Adv.

versus RMA ESTATES AND INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through:

Mr Pawan k. Mittal, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 13.02.2026 1.

The instant Suit has been filed by the Plaintiff for recovery of Rs.5,20,00,000/- along with pendente lite and future interest from the Defendant.

Vide Order dated 15.01.2024, the parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Vide Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025, the parties have settled their disputes amicably. A copy of the Settlement Agreement has been filed along with the application which reads as under:

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The parties have also affixed their signatures on the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025. Under the Settlement Agreement, the Defendant has agreed to pay Rs.4,00,00,000/- to the Plaintiff as full and final settlement. The Settlement Agreement gives the schedule of payment of Rs.4,00,00,000/- and the last of the payment is to be made on 25.11.2026. Learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant states that the last payment will be made on the date already decided, i.e. 25.11.2026 in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. The said statement is taken on record. 4.

This Court has gone through the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025, terms of which are legal, lawful and are capable of being accepted by the Court. The Parties shall be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025.

In view of the fact that settlement has been arrived at between the Parties, the Suit is disposed of in terms of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC as well the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025 entered into between the Parties.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 7.

Let the Decree Sheet be prepared accordingly. 8.

In view of the fact that the Parties have entered into a settlement and in view of the Judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Nutan Batra v. Buniyaad Associates, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12916, this Court is inclined to direct the refund of the entire court fees to the Plaintiff. 9.

Let the court fees be refunded in accordance with Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

10.

It is made clear that any violation of the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025 by any of the parties will attract the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 13, 2026 Rahul The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.