← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/6085/2026

Anil v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And ORS

2026-05-05Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal2 pages

$~53 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6085/2026 ANIL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Varun Singh, Ms. Eesha Kapur and Mr. Dev Nandan, Advocates.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Pooja Tandon, Advocate for R-1 & 2/MCD.

Mr. Raktim Gogoi, CGSC with Mr.

Kaushlendra D.

Pandey and Ms.

Akshita Nigam, Mr. Amish Tandon and Ms. Akanksha Mishra, Advocates for R-3/SHO.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 05.05.2026 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction from the respondent/MCD to take action against the unauthorised hotel being run by the private respondents no.4 and 5 at B-13, Khanpur Extension, Near Shiv Shakti Mandir, Khanpur, New Delhi-110062 (hereinafter 'subject premises').

2.

It is stated that the aforesaid hotel is running next to the house of the petitioner. The same is illegal and unauthorised in violation of the bylaws and without any sanction. Furthermore, the private respondents no.4 and 5 have not obtained permission for parking from the concerned authority. Due W.P.(C) 6085/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2026 at 12:07:04

to the unauthorised parking, there is heavy traffic in front of the house of the petitioner.

3.

Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-MCD on advance notice submits that a show-cause notice has been issued to the hotel on 14th January, 2026. Subsequently, on 1st April, 2026, a closure notice has been issued to the said hotel. She submits on instructions that as on date, no hotel is functioning at the subject premises.

4.

In view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent-MCD to ensure that it strictly acts in terms of the closure notice and ensure that no hotel runs at the subject premises. 5.

Liberty is given to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings in law in the event any further grievance survives. 6.

All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the hotel owner stand protected.

AMIT BANSAL, J MAY 5, 2026 Rzu W.P.(C) 6085/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2026 at 12:07:04