Naseem Ahmed v. Sh. Subhashish Panda And ANR

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 616/2024 NASEEM AHMED .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Bharti Garg, Adv. (through VC) versus SH. SUBHASHISH PANDA AND ANR .....Respondent Through:

Ms.

Manika Tripathy, Standing Counsel for DDA.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel, Mrs. KK Kiran Pathak, Mr.

Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advs. for R-2/LAC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 20.05.2025 1.

Ms. Bharti Garg, Advocate, appears and states that she has no further instructions from the petitioner and, therefore, seeks to be discharged; she is accordingly discharged.

2.

Ms. Manika Tripathy, Standing Counsel, appears for Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and states that this petition is not maintainable.

3.

The petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 3rd May 2016 in W.P.(C) 2680/2015.

4.

Ms. Manika Tripathy, informs that the Supreme Court by Judgment in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:38:52

Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal and Ors. 2024 INSC 456, in a batch matter, has set aside this order and remanded the matter back to the High Court.

5.

The matter is pending before the Writ Court and listed on 7th August 2025.

6.

Accordingly, this petition does not survive and is disposed of. 7.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J MAY 20, 2025/ak/tk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:38:52