State v. Raj Kumar & ORS

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 284/2019 STATE ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Aashaa Tewari, APP for State with SI Sandeep Shrivastav, PS Bharat Nagar, Delhi.

versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Amitesh Pandey, Advocate for R-1 & 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 10.07.2019 The present leave petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 15.12.2018 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (North-West), Special Court, POCSO, Rohini District Courts whereby the respondents have been acquitted under Sections 376/506 IPC as well as Section 6/21 of POCSO Act.

After having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that it is a fit case where leave ought to be granted to the State to challenge the impugned judgment. Ordered accordingly. Leave petition is allowed.

CRL.A. No. ............./2019 (to be numbered) The Registry is directed to register the present matter as a criminal appeal and assign it a number accordingly.

A complete set of the paper book shall also be furnished to learned

counsel for the parties.

Admit.

Trial Court record be requisitioned and tagged with the file. The compilation of the Trial Court record once prepared by the Registry shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties. List in the category of 'Regular Matters' at its own turn. The respondents shall furnish a personal bond and a surety bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each subject to the satisfaction of Joint Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. For the said purpose, list before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 18th July, 2019.

The respondent shall inform the local police in the event of any change of his residential address. He shall also furnish his mobile number to the local police which shall remain active at all times. MANMOHAN, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 10, 2019 afa/