Vaibhav Tyagi v. State NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3514/2026 VAIBHAV TYAGI .....Petitioner Through:

Petitioner with his counsel Mr. Balaji Pathak, Mr. Tripurari Jha and Mr.

Akshay Rathi, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State along with SI Sachin Rathee.

R-2 with his counsel.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 06.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 14243/2026 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3514/2026 3.

By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR bearing no. 35/2011, registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323/452/506/174A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟). 4.

The petitioner and respondent no. 2 (through video conferencing) are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Delhi.

5.

Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that on 03.02.2011, an altercation arose between respondent no. 2 and the petitioner due to some neighbourly dispute, and based on the aforesaid event, the present FIR was registered on 04.02.2011 against the petitioner under the relevant sections. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled the present matter vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 06.02.2026, entered between them. 6.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the concerned IO, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent no. 2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. Respondent no. 2 further states that he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 7.

In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 8.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 35/2011, registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323/452/506/174A of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.20,000/-, out of which Rs.10,000/- be deposited by the petitioner with Delhi Police Martyr's Fund and Rs. 10,000/- with Civil and Sessions Courts Stenographers‟ Association, Delhi, within a period of one week from date. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. 10.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 06, 2026/A/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.