Akhilesh Kulshrestha v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~48 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4407/2019 AKHILESH KULSHRESTHA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vipul Ganda, Adv. with Mr.Ayandeb Mitra, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through Ms.Saroj Bidawah, Adv. for R-1 to 3.

Mr.Shankh Sengupta, Adv. with Mr.Yogesh Singh & Ms.Vatsala Kumar, Advs. for R-4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

O R D E R

% 26.04.2019 CM APPL. 19627/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of. W.P.(C) 4407/2019 & CM APPL. 19626/2019 & 19628/2019 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks restraining the respondent no.2 from accepting or admitting Form DIR 12 or any other forms, that might be filed with the respondent no.2, by the respondent no.4Company, pursuant to the illegal termination of the petitioner, who has been a whole-time director of the respondent no.4-Company. Counsel for respondent no.4, who appears on advance notice, admitted that the petitioner is a Director as on date and there is no process

started for removing him as a whole time Director from respondent no.4 company. He further submits that if in future, the respondent no.4 decides that the petitioner shall be removed from the post of Director, the due process under the Companies Act shall be taken. Since the petition is at pre mature stage, the same is not maintainable and dismissed accordingly. Pending applications are also stand disposed of. SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J APRIL 26, 2019 ab