← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4536/2025

Save India Foundation v. Department Of Forest And Wildlife & ORS.

2025-04-09Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela,Hon'Ble Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya2 pages

$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4536/2025, CM APPL. 21011/2025 & CM APPL. 21012/2025 SAVE INDIA FOUNDATION .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Umesh Chandra Sharma, Mr.

Vikas Wajwan, Mr. Ritesh Kaushik, Mr. Neeraj Chauhan and Mr. Munish Kumar Gaur, Advocates.

versus DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND WILDLIFE & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Ms. Simran Kohli and Ms.

Akshata Sharma, Advocates for BSES.

Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocates for TPDDL/R-3.

Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr.

Abhinav Bhardwaj, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana and Mr.

Vandan Anand, Advocates for R-6.

Mr. Vedansh Anand, G.P. for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 09.04.2025 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By instituting these proceedings, certain prayers have been made for The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:12:41

issuing direction to the authorities concerned for protection of the national bird said to be suffering on account of electrocution in various installations of the power distribution companies (DISCOMS).

3.

For the said purpose, the petitioner has made a representation vide email dated 03.04.2025 to the Department of Forest and Wildlife, to the Secretary, Power, GNCTD, New Delhi and to certain other bodies. 4.

Learned counsel representing certain respondents have stated that no such representation have been made even to these respondents. 5.

Be that as it may. Since the representation for redressal of the grievances appears to have been made only on 03.04.2025 and within a week thereafter this petition has been filed, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition which is hereby dismissed.

6.

We, nonetheless, permit the petitioner to approach the appropriate authorities by way of making an exhaustive representation taking all the pleas which may be available to him under law within a fortnight. In case any such representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided and an appropriate action which may be warranted in law shall also be taken by the competent authority.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J APRIL 9, 2025 kct The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:12:41