Harish Chand Ahuja v. Sunila Sharma

$~19 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 254/2019 KAMLA KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus SUNILA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Advocate for R-1 + RC.REV. 255/2019 AMARIT PAL SINGH BEDI ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus SUNILA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Advocate for R-1 + RC.REV. 256/2019 NIRMALIJEET SINGH DUGGAL ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus SUNILA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Advocate for R-1 + RC.REV. 258/2019 YOGESH VIG ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus SUNILA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Advocate for R-1 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

+ RC.REV. 259/2019 HARISH CHAND AHUJA ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus SUNILA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Advocate for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 21.05.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 19335/2019 (delay in filing) in RC.REV. 254/2019 CM APPL. 19338/2019 (delay in filing) in RC.REV. 255/2019 CM APPL. 19462/2019 (delay in filing) in RC.REV. 256/2019 CM APPL. 19535/2019 (delay in filing) in RC.REV. 258/2019 CM APPL. 19549/2019 (delay in filing) in RC.REV. 259/2019 CM APPL. 50379/2019 (for direction) in RC.REV. 258/2019 CM APPL. 50378/2019 (additional affidavit) in RC.REV. 258/2019 CM APPL. 19340/2019 (stay) in RC.REV. 255/2019 CM APPL. 19464/2019 (stay) in RC.REV. 256/2019 CM APPL. 19537/2019 (stay) in RC.REV. 258/2019 CM APPL. 19551/2019 (stay) in RC.REV. 259/2019 1.

Earlier in the first call, none was present for petitioners, so matter was passed over awaiting counsel for petitioners. However, learned counsel for respondent was present in the earlier call as well. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

2.

It is submitted by learned counsel for respondent that possession of subject premises involved in all these cases stand restored to the respondent/landlord in the execution proceedings way back in the year 2019. 3.

Since none appears for petitioners even in this second call at 3:45 pm, all these petitions and pending applications are dismissed in default. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 21, 2024/ry Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.