Farman v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1427/2025 & CRL.M.As. 14998/2025, 14999/2025 FARMAN .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi and Mr.

Tushar Tokas, Advocates.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

SI Kanhiya Lal, P.S. Shahdara.

Mr. Aman Bhardwaj and Mr. Arpit Sharma, Advocates for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 21.05.2025 1.

This is the third bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (earlier Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973) seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 351/2022 dated 1st October, 2022, registered under Sections 392, 394, 397 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, at P.S. Shahdara, Delhi.

2.

The proceedings were being adjourned for recording of the statement of the Victim/Complainant i.e., PW-1, who was partly examined on 24th October, 2024, and her remaining statement was deferred, as the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory1, regarding the CCTV footage relating to the incident, is still awaited.

3.

In light of the above, Counsel for Applicant seeks leave to withdraw The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:17:32

the present petition with liberty to apply afresh before the Trial Court once the statement of the Complainant is recorded. 4.

Leave and liberty granted.

5.

FSL is further directed to expedite the report relating to the CCTV footage. For this purpose, the concerned ACP shall follow up with the FSL. 6.

The Trial Court is requested to record the remaining testimony of the Complainant as expeditiously as possible, subject to the availability of the FSL report.

7.

Liberty is granted to the Applicant to renew his request for bail before the Trial Court after the testimony of the complainant is recorded. Such request shall be examined on its own merits in accordance with law. 8.

All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. 9.

The Court has not commented on the merits of the case. 10.

Dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications with the liberty as aforesaid.

SANJEEV NARULA, J MAY 21, 2025 as 1 "FSL"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:17:32