Rajiv Kumar v. Devender Bhardwaj & ANR
<ip $-43 to 45 (common order) *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 4303/2013 RAJIV KUMAR Petitioner Through: - Mr. Aditya Vikram, Advocate versus Respondents Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, AFP for the State with SI Bramha Prakash, PS Kapashera Mr. S.P. Kaushal, Adv. for R-2 & STATE & ORS Through:
7-^ R-3.
+ CRL.M.C. 4904/2014 + CRL.M.C. 645/2014 RAJIV KUMAR Through:
Petitioner Mr. Aditya Vikram, Advocate versus DEVENDER BHARDWAJ & ANR Respondents Through:
Mr. S.P. Kaushal, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Bramha Prakash, PS Kapashera
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
ORDER
% 09.08.2019 After some hearing the counsel for the petitioner submits that given the time lapse after the impugned orders having been passed, in the context of a case arising out of FIR No. 193/2013 of Police Station Kapeshera, involving offences under section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 CRL.M.C. 4303/2013 etc.
Page I of2 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
(IPC) and the lack of progress in the prosecution of the said case, as indeed in the cross-case of the opposite party arising out of FIR No. 194/2013, both being subject matter of challenge in revisional jurisdiction before the District and Sessions Judge, New Delhi over the last several years, he is under instructions to withdraw these petitions for cancellation of bail under section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). During the course of hearing, the delay in disposal of the revision petitions arising out of afore mentioned two FIRs, pending on the file of the District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi came to the fore. The District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi is requested to expedite the adjudication on the said revision petitions, the parties before this court assuring their full co operation.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
.G AUGUST 09, 2019 vk CRL M. C. 4303/2013 etc.