Sukhbir Singh & ANR. v. State NCT Of Delhi & ORS.

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C.

3610/2026, CRL.M.A.

14629/2026, CRL.M.A.

14630/2026 SUKHBIR SINGH & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Pulkit Khanduja and Mr.

Harshit Khanduja, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms.

Upasana Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advs.

SI- Naveen Sharma, PS: Bawana

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 08.05.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.64/2017 dated 12.02.2017 registered at PS: Bawana, Rohini, Delhi under Sections 323/341/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as also all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 04.04.2026 [Annexure P7] arrived between the petitioners and the respondent nos.2 and 3, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of their identity.

2.

Issue notice.

3.

Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4.

Respondent nos.2 and 3, present in Court, also accept notice and The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/05/2026 at 11:44:07

affirm the terms of the aforesaid MOU dated 04.04.2026, and as such, submit that they have no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 5.

The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO. 6.

Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioners and the respondent nos.2 and 3 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) to that effect. In view thereof, the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility.

7.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed FIR No.64/2017 dated 12.02.2017 registered at PS: Bawana, Rohini, Delhi under Sections 323/341/354/34 IPC as also all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

8.

The present petition, along with the pending applications, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 8, 2026/Ab The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/05/2026 at 11:44:07