Rajeev Nag v. State Of Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1503/2026 and CRL.M.A. 14731-14732/2026 RAJEEV NAG .....Petitioner Through:

versus STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr.Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 02.07.2026 1.

The instant petition is for the following reliefs:- "a ) Issue an appropriate writ , order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities to consider, decide and take appropriate action on the complaints submitted by the Petitioner, namely:

(i) Complaint dated 02.04.2026 [ ANNEXURE P- 1 ], (ii) Reminder dated 15.04.2026, [ANNEXURE P-2] and (iii ) Second Reminder dated 20.04 .2026 [ ANNEXURE P-3], and to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a time bound manner;

b) Further direct the Respondent Authorities to initiate criminal proceedings against Saurabh Bhargav, Chamber No.40, Lawyer Chamber, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi , Mobile No.9873566019 and other persons who involved in the same for offences including impersonation of a statutory authority, cheating, forgery , use of forged documents and criminal conspiracy;

c) And pass any other or further order(s ) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice." The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2026 at 11:13:08

2.

It is the case of the petitioner that he has filed complaints dated 02.04.2026, 15.04.2026 and 28.04.2026 before respondent-Authority to initiate criminal proceedings in accordance with law for serious cognizable offences involving impersonation of a statutory authority, cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy.

3.

If the petitioner believes that a cognizable offence has been committed, the petitioner will have to take appropriate remedy of filing a criminal complaint before the Court of competent jurisdiction. There cannot be unilateral directions for deciding such a representation/ complaint by respondent-Authority.

4.

With the aforesaid liberty, the instant petition along with all pending applications stands dismissed.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 2, 2026 Nc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2026 at 11:13:08