Shri Rahul Tomar And ORS. v. The State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) And ANR

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3002/2024 SHRI RAHUL TOMAR AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Manish Awasthi, Advocate with petitioners in person.

versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Sweta, P.S. Baba Haridas Nagar.

Mr. Ashim Vachher, Amicus Curiae for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI % 27.08.2024

O R D E R

1.

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 0594/2022 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Baba Haridas Nagar on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioners, wherein petitioner No. 1 is a husband and petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 are in-laws of the complainant. 3.

Mr. Sabharwal, learned APP for the State submits that in the present case petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No. 2 is the complainant/victim.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:23:47

4.

It is submitted that parties have settled their disputes vide MOU dated 13.12.2022. In terms of the settlement, the parties have already been granted divorce by mutual consent vide divorce decree dated 08.12.2023 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Courts (HQ), South West, Dwarka, Delhi in HMA No. 3762/2023.

5.

Petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by I.O./SI Sweta, P.S. Baba Haridas Nagar.

6.

Respondent No. 2 states that she has settled her disputes with petitioner No.1 out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She submits that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed against the petitioners.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J AUGUST 27, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:23:47