← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4898/2025

Yuva Samiti v. Government Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS.

2025-04-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sachin Datta2 pages

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4898/2025, CM APPL. 22526/2025 - INT. RELIEF YUVA SAMITI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ashu Bidhuri, Mr. Swapnam Prakash Singh, Mr. Shubham, Ms.

Sabana Hussain, Advs.

versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Shivangle Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Kumar Arya, Advs. for R-2(MCD).

Dr. Sarbjit Sharma, Ms. Laxmi Sharma, Ms. Pooja Sharma, Advs. for R3 (Delhi Police).

Ms. Vaishali Gupta (Panel Counsel).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 17.04.2025

O R D E R

CM APPL. 22527/2025 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4898/2025 3.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking prayers as under:

"a. Issue appropriate writ/order/directions in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent No 1 to ensure the immediate repair of the street lights installed along Jagatpur Yamuna Pusta Road to make them operational.

b. Issue appropriate writ/order/directions in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 and 3 to remove obstacles/hinderances on Yamuna Pusta Road (Wazirabad to Hiranki).

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2025 at 15:56:39

c. Issue appropriate writ/order/directions in the nature of mandamus and direct the Respondents to pay the cost of this petition to the petitioner." 4.

It has been brought out the notice of this Court that the petitioner has filed various representations to the concerned authorities, however, no action has been taken on the said representation till date. 5.

After some hearing, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the concerned authority of GNCTD / respondent no.1 to consider the grievances highlighted by the petitioner as regards the street lights. Further, the concerned authorities of the respondent no.1 and the respondent no.2 (Municipal Corporation of Delhi) are directed to consider the present petition as a representation as regards alleged obstacles/ hindrances on Yamuna Pusta Road (Wazirabad to Hiranki). 6.

The above officials are directed to bestow their active consideration to the matter and take such remedial steps as may be warranted. Let the needful be done as expeditiously as possible, and preferably within a period of eight weeks from today.

7.

Dr. Sarbjit Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3/Delhi Police submits that although no relief has been sought/ is maintainable against the said respondent, if any action is required to be taken by the said respondent upon disposal of the aforesaid representation/s, the needful shall be done by the said respondent. 8.

In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the outcome of the aforesaid exercise, he shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies under law. 9.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. APRIL 17, 2025/uk SACHIN DATTA, J The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2025 at 15:56:39