Kuldeep Singh And ORS v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3036/2024 KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through:
Mr Vinay Kumar, Advocate along with petitioners in person.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with SI Ranjana, PS Subzi Mandi.
Ms Jasmeet Kaur, Mr R. S. Tiwari and Ms Tushti Aneja, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 23.04.2024 CRL.M.A. 11707-08/2024 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.A. 11709/2024 2.
The present application has been filed by the petitioner no.2 seeking exemption from personal appearance of the petitioner no.2. 3.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 4.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 3036/2024 5.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No.0121/2015 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement.
6.
Issue notice. The learned APP for the State accepts notice. He submits The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
that since the FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have arrived at a settlement, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
7.
The petitioner no.1 (former husband) and petitioner nos.3 to 5, who are close relatives of the petitioner no.1, as well as, respondent no. 2 (former wife) are present in the Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel and by the Investigating Officer SI Ranjana, PS Subzi Mandi.
8.
The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 29.01.2005 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Out of the said wedlock, one girl child, namely, Amrit Kaur was born, who is in the care and custody of the respondent no.2. 9.
On account of temperamental issues certain disputes arose between the parties and they started living separately w.e.f. 30.08.2012. The dispute between the parties also led to the registration of present FIR. 10.
During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, where they arrived at a settlement, terms whereof were reduced in writing in the form of Settlement dated 13.07.2023, a copy which is annexed as Annexure P-3 (Colly.) to the present petition.
11.
In terms of the said settlement, the parties decided to dissolve their marriage by filing a petition for divorce by way of mutual consent. Accordingly, the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have obtained a decree of divorce dated 06.11.2023, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure P-4 to the present petition.
12.
It is a term of the settlement between the parties that the petitioner The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
no.1 shall pay a total sum of Rs.20 lakhs to the respondent no.2 towards full and final settlement of all her claims on account of streedhan, permanent alimony, dowry articles, maintenance (past, present and future) etc. Out of the said amount, a sum of Rs.10 lakhs has already been paid by the petitioner no.1 to the respondent no.2 in the manner as mentioned in the settlement. The remaining amount of Rs.10 lakhs has been paid to the respondent no.2 today in the court by the petitioner no.1 by way of Demand Draft bearing No.218277 dated 06.03.2024 issued by State Bank of India. 13.
The receipt of entire amount of Rs.20 lakhs is acknowledged by the respondent no.2, who is present in court.
14.
The respondent no.2, on a query put by the Court, states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.
15.
In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them.
16.
It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed. 17.
Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No.0121/2015 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi alongwith all other proceedings emanating therefrom, is quashed.
18.
The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 19.
Order be uploaded on the website of this court. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 23, 2024/MK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.