← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P./526/2024

Arvind Kumar v. Anju@Chandra Prabha

2024-05-29Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vikas Mahajan2 pages

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 526/2024 & CRL.M.A. 11854/2024, CRL.M.A. 11855/2024 ARVIND KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajbir Singh Sagar, Mr. Rajiv Pratap Singh and Mr. Ravi, Advs.

versus ANJU@CHANDRA PRABHA ..... Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 29.05.2024 1.

The present petition is filed under Section 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), challenging the proceedings before the learned Family Court, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in execution case being Ex. Crl. No. 456/2023.

2.

The execution proceedings were initiated by the respondent, seeking execution of the order dated 03.08.2023 passed by the learned Family Court, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the petitioner was directed to pay a monthly interim maintenance of ₹20,000/- under Section 125 of the CrPC.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to pay the said amount and has therefore challenged the proceeding pending before the Executing Court.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:34:15

the order under Section 125 of the CrPC was passed erroneously without considering the material on record.

5.

It is not disputed that the order dated 03.08.2023 has already been challenged and is pending consideration before this Court in CRL.REV.P. 1278/2023.

6.

It is not disputed that this Court in the pending proceedings has not stayed the effect of the order dated 03.08.2023. The argument that the order was passed erroneously, would be considered by this Court in CRL.REV.P. 1278/2023. 7.

In such circumstances, this Court finds no infirmity in the Executing Court continuing with the execution proceedings for execution of the order dated 03.08.2023.

8.

The petitioner cannot be allowed to indirectly challenge and seek stay of the order dated 03.08.2023 by challenging the execution proceedings when the challenge to the said order is admittedly pending.

9.

The present petition is, therefore, dismissed. 10.

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J MAY 29, 2024 'KDK'

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:34:15