Praful Surana v. Income Tax Officer Ward 30 1 & ORS.

$~352 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023 + W.P.(C) 7624/2023 PRAFUL SURANA ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv.

versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 30 1 & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Gaurav Gupta, Sr. Standing Counsel.

Mr Chiranjiv Kumar & Mukesh Sachdeva, Advs. for U.O.I.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

CM No.39140/2023 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM No. 39139/2023 2.

This is an application filed seeking recall of order dated 30.05.2023. 3.

A perusal of the order would show that the petitioner's counsel, i.e., Ms Mitika Choudhary, had made a submission before the Court that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, as the assessment order has been passed.

4.

Since liberty was sought to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as By:NEELAM SHARMA 09:20:34 W.P.(C) 7624/2023

per law, leeway in that behalf was granted.

5.

It is not disputed by Ms Choudhary that since the time order dated 30.05.2023 was passed, a statutory appeal has been preferred. 6.

In our view, this application is completely without merit. 7.

The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

8.

RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE AUGUST 2, 2023/RY Click here to check corrigendum, if any By:NEELAM SHARMA 09:20:34 W.P.(C) 7624/2023