Gotam v. The State NCT Of Delhi And ANR

$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1551/2026, CRL.M.A. 15303/2026 GOTAM .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Charul Chaudhary, Adv. with petitioner in person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Ms. Pragya Sharma, Advs. with ASI Kishor Kumar, PS: North Rohini Mr. Kanwarpreet Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 (through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 15.05.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.135/2026 dated 18.03.2026 registered at PS: North Rohini under Sections 281/125(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Memorandum of Understanding dated 27.04.2026 (Annexure P2) arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.

2.

Issue notice. Learned ASC for State accepts notice and submits that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 3.

Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding dated 27.04.2026, whereby the petitioner has already paid him a sum of Rs.30,000/- out of total settlement amount of Rs.90,000/- and a Demand Draft being DD No.750855 dated 07.05.2026 (Union Bank of India, Branch-Sector-22, Rohini, Delhi) of Rs.60,000/- has been handed over to him today as full and final settlement of all his present, past and future claims, etc. He further submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.

4.

The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the IO. 5.

Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, they shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner will be an exercise in futility. 6.

Thus, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.135/2026 dated 18.03.2026 registered at PS: North Rohini under Sections 281/125(a) BNS and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

7.

Accordingly, the present petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

MAY 15, 2026/So The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.