Kumar Vimal And ORS v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3820/2026, CRL.M.A. 15486/2026 KUMAR VIMAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Amit Khanna, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms. Divya Bakshi and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates SI Udit, PS.: Ranhola Mr. Krishna Roy, Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 present in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R
% 15.05.2026 1.
By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.445/2024 dated 08.06.2024 registered at PS: Ranhola, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Settlement dated 29.06.2024 (Annexure P3), arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identities. 2.
Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 3.
Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
the terms of the aforesaid Settlement dated 29.06.2024 whereby the petitioner no.1 has already paid her the total amount of Rs.8,75,000/- as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. and She further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved by mutual consent in terms of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 vide judgment dated 30.09.2024 and as such, she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.
4.
The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer.
5.
Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, they shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 6.
Thus, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.445/2024 dated 08.06.2024 registered at PS.: Ranhola, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/ 506/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
7.
Accordingly, the present petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
MAY 15, 2026/bh The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.