Shri Sarwan Kumar v. Sh Gyanesh Bharti $ ANR

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 407/2020 & CM APPL.18701/2020 SHRI SARWAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advocate.

versus SH GYANESH BHARTI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Gaurang Kant, Standing counsel with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 11.08.2020 1.

The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents on advance notice submits that a speaking order has been passed on 10.08.2020 and as per the decision, the case of the petitioners is not covered by the scheme and they are not entitled to alternative accommodation. 3.

He submits that in terms of the speaking order steps would be taken to evict the petitioners from the respective jhuggi jhopris. He submits that prior to any physical eviction taking place a notice to vacate, granting at least one week's time, would be issued to the petitioners. The statement is taken on record. 4.

In view of the above, respondents are directed to communicate order dated 10.08.2020 to the petitioners and also to the counsel for the MAGGU to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.

CONT.CAS(C) 407/2020

petitioner. It is further directed that for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the order dated 10.08.2020 to the petitioner, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 5.

In view of the above statement and assurance given by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the order dated 10.08.2020.

6.

The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

7.

Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 11, 2020 rk MAGGU to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.

CONT.CAS(C) 407/2020