Rajkumar v. State NCT Of Delhi

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL) 1218/2020 RAJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr Joginder Tuli, Advocates.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms Kamna Vohra, ASC for state.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 01.09.2020 [Hearing held through video conferencing] CRL.M.A. 12027/2020 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.A. 12026/2020 (direction) 3.

The petitioner has filed the present application, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to release the petitioner on parole for a period of thirty days. It is stated that by an order dated 11.08.2020, this court had directed the concerned authority to consider the petitioner's application for parole and communicate its decision as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of ten working days from that date. However, the said order has not been complied with and the competent authority has not communicated its decision as yet.

4.

Ms Vohra, learned ASC appearing for the State states the petitioner's Signed By:DUSHYANT RAWAL Location:

22:34:47

application for parole was considered and rejected by an earlier order dated 21.08.2020 on the ground that he had jumped parole on earlier occasions. She submits that there has been some delay in communication of the decision to the petitioner but the same would be done during the course of the day.

5.

In view of the above, the present application is dismissed. 6.

It is clarified that all rights and contentions of the petitioner in regard to the said order rejecting his application for parole are reserved. VIBHU BAKHRU, J SEPTEMBER 01, 2020 pkv Signed By:DUSHYANT RAWAL Location:

22:34:47