Mayank Gupta v. State, Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2637/2017 & CRL.M.A. 10959/2017 MAYANK GUPTA .....Petitioner Through:

Nemo versus STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Koyal Mr. Wasim Ashraf and Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocates for respondent No. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 22.02.2019 CRL.M.A. 10960/2017 (delay) There is delay of 08 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned.

The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2637/2017 & CRL.M.A. 10959/2017 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that Notice under Section 251 of Cr. P.C. was framed way back in the year 2017 and by now substantial evidence must have been recorded in this petition.

Page | 1

Quashing of FIR No. 1592/2015, under Sections 287/338 of IPC registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi is sought on merits. Since none appears on behalf of petitioner even on the second call, therefore, this petition and the application are dismissed in default. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE FEBRUARY 22, 2019 v Page | 2