Aditya Giri v. The State & ORS.

$~103 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3262/2024, CRL.M.A. 12576/2024 ADITYA GIRI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Mr.

Kawalpreet Singh, Mr. Nikhil Narula, Mr.

Manish Malik, Mr.

Vijay Chaturvedi and Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Advocates.

versus THE STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Ankush, P.S. Aman Vihar.

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are present in Court.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 26.04.2024 1.

The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 899/2018 registered under Section 363 IPC at P.S. Aman Vihar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

The allegations in the present FIR pertain to the offence of kidnapping.

3.

Mr. Jha, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is the only accused person and respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the complainants/victims in the present case.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner and respondent No. 3 have married each other and their marriage has been The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2024 at 12:18:01

accepted by respondent No.2, father of respondent No.3. 5.

Petitioner, who is present in Court, has been identified by his counsel as well as the I.O./SI Ankush, P.S. Aman Vihar. 6.

Respondent No. 2/complainant, who is present in Court and has been identified by I.O., states that though a missing report was lodged by him, however, subsequently, confirms that his daughter i.e. respondent No.3 and petitioner have solemnized their marriage which is accepted by him and other family members. Respondent No.3, who is also present in Court and has been identified by the I.O., states that she is aged about 20 years of age. She further states that she is wife of petitioner and their marriage was solemnized on 12.08.2022, which was registered before the SDM, South West, Dwarka, Delhi on 06.09.2022. Both respondent Nos. 2 and 3 state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. 9.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J APRIL 26, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2024 at 12:18:01