High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/2601/2003

Jagdish Kumar v. University Of Delhi & ORS.

2017-03-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Valmiki J. Mehta1 pages

$~R-24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2601/2003 SHRI JAGDISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Ishan Jain, proxy counsel for respondent No.1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 17.03.2017 1.

No one appears for the petitioner.

No one appeared for the petitioner earlier on three dates of hearing being 2.2.2016, 14.3.2016 and 29.4.2016. I may note that presence on 29.4.2016 of the counsel is wrongly recorded for the petitioner whereas it should be for the respondent no.1 and which is clear from the earlier order dated 14.3.2016. 2.

Since no one appears for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J MARCH 17, 2017 Ne