Himanshu v. State

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 162/2017 HIMANSHU ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand, Adv. with father of petitioner.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Mantosh Kumar, PS Mandir Marg.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 27.01.2017 Crl.M.A. 1536/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Bail Appln. No.162/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from the parokar of thepetitioner who is the father of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh application before the learned Trial Court.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JANUARY 27, 2017 'v mittal'