← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3967/2026

Sh Suneet Sekhri v. State Gnct Of Delhi & ANR.

2026-05-19Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma3 pages

$~105 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3967/2026 SH SUNEET SEKHRI .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Neha Rana, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State.

Counsel (appearance not given) for R2 and R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 19.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 16072/2026 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3967/2026 3.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR bearing No. 352/2023, registered at Police Station Ranjeet Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.

4.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

5.

The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Ranjeet Nagar, Delhi. 6.

Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2 was solemnized at Delhi on 04.01.2019, in accordance with HIndu rites and ceremonies. It is stated that due to various differences, disputes and issues had arisen between the petitioners and the respondent no.

2. Upon the complaint by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioners. It is stated that with intervention of the family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their dispute vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 07.09.2025 and the parties are presently living together.

7.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated that she has already received the amount as per the said MoU. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 8.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 352/2023, registered at Police Station Ranjeet Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

therefrom are quashed.

10.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. 11.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 19, 2026/vc/ap The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.