Kashvi Enterprises v. Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes & ANR.
$~28-30, 42-43, 45, 46 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 687/2017 KASHVI ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR...... Respondents + W.P.(C) 693/2017 A.M. ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 694/2017 RAI LUBRICANTS ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 820/2017 M/S KRISHNANAK PACKAGING PROPRIETOR SH.
DAVINDER SINGH CHADDA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.
..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 822/2017 M/S SAVITA ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, & ANR...... Respondents + W.P.(C) 824/2017 Q.A. AUTO INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 825/2017 T.A. ENGG. WORKS ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR...... Respondents + W.P.(C) 11579/2016, C.M. APPL.45609/2016 GOODWILL TUBEWELLS (INDIA) ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR...... Respondents Through : Sh. S.K. Khurana, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.28.
Sh. Chanderkant Singh, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.29.
Sh. A.K. Babbar adn Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.42.
Sh. Nitin Gulati, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.46.
Sh.
Naunidh.
S.
Arora, Advocates, for respondents, in Item No. 28.
Sh. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate, for respondents, in Item Nos. 29, 45 and 46.
Sh. Shadan Farasat and Sh. Ahmed Said, Advocates, for respondents, in Item No.42.
Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate, for respondents, in Item Nos. 43 & 50.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 15.02.2017 Issue notice. Sh. Naunidh. S. Arora, Advocate accepts notice in Item No.28; Sh. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate accepts notice in Item
Nos. 29, 45 and 46; Sh. Shadan Farasat, Advocate accepts notice in Item No.42 and Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC accepts notice in Item Nos. 43 & 50.
In W.P.(C) 687/2017, W.P.(C) 694/2017, W.P.(C) 820/2017 and W.P.(C) 822/2017, the DVAT Department states that even though the matter is under process, appropriate refund orders will be made. In the remaining cases, it is stated by the learned counsel for the respondents that they will obtain instructions and in case the amounts are not refunded, the respondents shall indicate by what dates the petitioners would be refunded the amounts - through tabular chart. The respondents are directed to process the petitioners' case for refund and ensure that the amounts together with interest shall be remitted to the petitioners' accounts within 10 days. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J FEBRUARY 15, 2017/ajk