Vinay Surgical v. Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$-25, 27, 32-35, 44, 47-49 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.ICl 9931/2016. C.M. APPL.39480/2016 ENVIRO INFRA ENGINEERS PVT LTD Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.

Respondents + W.p.rci 11911/2016 M/S SUNANDA PACKAGING PVT LIMITED'

Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER OFVAT & ANR.

Respondents + W.P.tCl 696/2017 VINAY SURGICAL Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents + W.P.fCl 697/2017 VINAY SURGICAL Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents + W.P.rCl 698/2017 RADIANT ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD.

Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents + W.PTCl 699/2017 VINAY SURGICAL Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 823/2017 SAAL INTERNATIONAL (MEDICAL) Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE 8c TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents Page I of 3

2A + W.p.(0 11571/2016. C.M. APPT , L.R.SHARMA&CO.

petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents W.PTCI 11573/2016. C.M. APPL.45597/2016 L.R.SHARMA & CO.

Petitioner + versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents W.PTCI 11578/2016. C.M. APPL.45608/2nifi L.R.SHARMA & CO.

Petitioner + versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents + W.PTQ 11660/2016 NATIONAL INDUSTRIES INDIA Petitioner ^ versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAXES Respondent Through : Sh. Vasdev Lalwani, Sh. Sunil Agarwal and Sh. Rohit Gautam, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item No.25.

Sh. S.K. Khurana, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 32, 33 and 35.

Sh. Nitin Gulati, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.44.

Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate, for respondents, in Item Nos. 25 & 51.

Sh. Mamneet Singh, Advocate, for GNCTD, in ItemNos. 27, 32, 33 &35.

Sh. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate, for respondents, in Item Nos. 34 & 44.

Sh. Satyakam, ASC with Sh. Naveen Jaldiar, Advocate, for GNCTD, in Item Nos. 47 to 49.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR;

JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI

ORDER

% 15.02:2017 ^ The respondent/DVAT Department states that the refund claims have been approved and that appropriate orders would be made and that amounts will be paid. In all these cases, the respondents shall ensure that refund orders arc made in respect of the pending claim applications within two weeks. In all eases, the amounts together with interest shall be remitted to the petitioners' accounts within 10 days. The writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NAJMI«WAZIRI, J FEBRUARY 15,2017/ajk